WASHINGTON: Microsoft Corp. filed a long appellate brief Monday arguing it
must not be broken in two and denying every element of a lower court ruling that
it had violated the antitrust law.
Microsoft said the "entire proceeding" before US District Judge
Thomas Penfield Jackson had been "infected with error," and that the
"existing trial record was insufficient to support the radical relief"
requested by the Justice Department.
In fact, Microsoft told the appeals court that its Windows operating system
did not even constitute a monopoly if the market in which it operates is
"properly defined": "Microsoft does not possess 'monopoly
power,'" argued the firm in its written argument.
But the Justice Department said that the June 7 decision by Judge Jackson to
break up the company - after finding that Microsoft used its monopoly power in
personal computer operating systems to compete illegally - was "well
supported by trial evidence."
(C) Reuters Limited 2000.