Jamie LaReau
NEW YORK: Right around his one-year anniversary with technology firm Acxiom
Corp., Todd Cullen learned his pay check would be cut by 5 per cent for at least
the next year. Far from being disappointed, Cullen said that, in the current
economic environment, he was happy just to keep his job with the firm, which is
based in Little Rock, Arkansas, and which manages customer data for clients.
"I'm excited to have a job," Cullen said. "I think we all
are." To stave off massive job cuts and trim costs, Acxiom told its 6,000
employees on Monday that, effective immediately, anyone earning more than
$25,000 a year would have to take a 5 per cent pay cut.
On Thursday, a much bigger company, network testing equipment maker Agilent
Technologies announced a 10 per cent temporary pay cut. Agilent said business
was worse than expected and sales were faltering to customers like big
communications firms.
"We are trying to avoid across-the-board layoffs," Agilent
president and chief executive Ned Barnholt said on Thursday. Agilent shares fell
9.2 per cent on Friday to $27.80, a fraction of its 52-week high of $124.94.
Agilent and Acxiom are among the first companies to propose such a plan,
according to employment experts, who say other firms may follow suit.
"This is a creative way to attempt to accomplish what most employers
would like to do in a period when they envision the downturn to be short-lived
and would like to keep their employees," said Fred Braid, a partner and
labor law expert at the law firm of Holland & Knight.
Employment law experts favor options
In an economic downturn, employers might want to axe people who make the highest
salaries, said Lois Schlissel, partner at New York-based law firm Meyer, Suozzi,
English and Klein. Schlissel, who practices employment law, often advises
companies against that because it could open the company to age discrimination
suits, because older workers are typically better paid.
"It's with the intent to show that the lay off is not a pretext for
purging the company of all their workers, but truly a program geared to reduce
the payroll," Schlissel said of the pay cuts. Earlier this year, Charles
Schwab Corp. asked employees to take Fridays off for a short period in order to
scale back on payroll expenses rather than make massive layoffs.
Thomas Palley, assistant director of public policy for the AFL-CIO
confederation of labor unions, said organized labor would frown on pay cuts as
well as job cuts. "We'd be against both," Palley said. "Both
would be the wrong way of going against a national economic problem."
Creative
Charles Morgan, known at Acxiom as "company leader" instead of chief
executive, took a 20 per cent, or $140,000, pay cut along with his employees.
"We wanted to maintain the motivation and excitement about our business at
the same time we were cutting expenses," Morgan said.
Acxiom's shares closed at $13-3/16 on Nasdaq on Friday, down 3.2 per cent on
the day and well below its year high of $45-3/4. The company offset the pay cut
with a stock option plan, under which the company gave the 5,100 workers,
affected by the cut the chance to buy shares that will be matched one-for-one by
the company.
Cullen, who said he volunteered to lose another 1 per cent of his paycheck in
order to get more stock options, said he viewed the move positively. "It
could be a lot worse, there could have been some serious layoffs," Cullen
said.
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.