Advertisment

Netscape, Mozilla: Which one is real?

author-image
CIOL Bureau
Updated On
New Update

Advertisment

BANGALORE: Oh dear! There's another new Internet Explorer-related flaw to spoil the

party. Of course, Microsoft tried about a month ago to cast off the IE ship

and attendant Outlook Express rowboat. But the clamor from the shore front

made them reconsider. Seems the most popular free browser and the best free

email client out they are not ready to be abandoned.

Actually, I think Outlook Express is the best free email and news client:

two excellent good utilities for nothing more than the cost of downloading a

great browser. A previous column mentioned that in tests, IE outperformed

Netscape, Mozilla, Opera, and AOL's browser in page rendering.

As for you die-hard Netscape fans, you've been lied to in the best American

corporate tradition. I read that Netscape has been Mozilla with a different

name since Version 4.7 (which coincidentally is about the time Netscape

started manifesting a bug epidemic).

Advertisment

While the open-source Mozilla browser kept evolving, and improving. Netscape

was nobody's child, stuck in a time warp of AOL Time Warner's making. And

was patched subsequent to Mozilla. Instead of it being the other way around.

And Netscape 7 is the runt of the Mozilla family; it's actually a disguised

version of Mozilla 1.0.

But that's taking us away from this week's main focus: a Trojan than

redirects IE from over 100 well-known URLs to an IP address with malafide

(malicious) intent. Qhosts (Delude.B) although classified as low-risk by

anti-virus vendors, redirects infected systems from legitimate sites like

AltaVista, Google, Lycos, MSN and Yahoo to a fixed IP address that's since

gone offline, causing the virus to go into a loop and crash IE!

The new flaw lies in the way IE is supposed to determine Object Types (see

also HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/sec

urity/bulletin/MS03-032.asp" TARGET="_msupdate">Microsoft Security Bulletin

MS03-032 released August 20, 2003). I think this failure is another

RPC-type update that was improperly tested to begin with and where the

security team failed to plug all the holes.

Advertisment

A theory borne out by the HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/sec

urity/bulletin/MS03-040.asp" TARGET="_msupdate">updated patch released

October 3, 2003, that assists IE in correctly determining the right object

type. However, while this cumulative update includes Internet Explorer

patches released with bulletins A

HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/sec

urity/bulletin/MS03-004.asp" TARGET="_msupdate">MS03-004, HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/sec

urity/bulletin/MS03-015.asp" TARGET="_msupdate">MS03-015, HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/sec

urity/bulletin/MS03-020.asp" TARGET="_blank">MS03-020 and the afore

mentioned MS03-032, it cause window.showHelp() to cease functioning unless

you apply the HTML Help update (see HREF="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;811630"

TARGET="_msupdate">Knowledge Base article 811630).

HTML Help is used by several programs, including some Windows versions to

display the Help file. As the specific vulnerability may also impact upon

Windows Media Player, you need to patch this software too (see HREF="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;828026"

TARGET="_msupdate">Knowledge Base Article 828026) to prevent the Player

from auto-launching URLs when running in the Local Zone (security settings

disabled).

The real risk with such viruses lies in the ability for the malicious to

embed virus' code into scripted (HTML) email that when previewed would

self-execute. And while I agree with the view that Microsoft's not doing

enough to protect users and is willfully exposing us to malicious attacks at

the same time, there are lots of little-documented traps we can engage.

Advertisment

Like the OE feature to view all HTML mail in the Restricted Sites zone. And

the feature to render all mail as plain text. And to block potentially

harmful attachments (usually enabled by default in OE 6). You can also

change IE's settings (Tools > Options > Security > Custom Settings) by

disabling ActiveX or better seeking explicit user permission before

permitting execution. And by switching to an alternate browser like HREF="http://www.mozilla.org/" TARGET="_blank">Firebird; even if it

renders pages slower. And like the locked front door to your home, you

definitely need a good firewall program. As well as an intelligent

anti-virus software with a mail scanner. Have all these in place and the

chances of an accidental infection are greatly reduced. After all, you don't

secure the main entry into your home with a cardboard sheets now do you?

And while you're bolting those doors, and installing security grills, do

take time to check out this excellent HREF="http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~rakerman/trojan-port-table.html"

TARGET="_blank">FAQ on TCP/IP ports most commonly attacked by Trojans.

The site is also a treasure trove on more IP-related information about

Trojan attacks.

I erred last week with nPOP. It's a crappy, ill-formed software that's no

replacement for Popcorn; even if you are a masochist. So either dig out an

old copy of Popcorn, or begin using OE6 in fully-locked down condition. OE

does POP as well as IMAP. And if you've been tracking Betas, there have been

2 MyIE2 releases this week. The first with several significant improvements

to the code base resulting in a faster rendering speed. The second because

Latin characters in the previous version were rendering incorrectly.

Advertisment

And reader Anand wrote to me rather indignantly that CD Burner XP Pro is a

rip-off because at 8 MB it's bigger than Nero, doesn't support MP3 burning

and is slow. It is larger than old Nero but definitely smaller than Nero 6

that clocks in at 14 MB! And it can't encode WAVs to MP3 because there's no

included Fraunhofer MP3 conversion codec. Yes, it is slower by a few seconds

but its write speed is also very dependent on the hardware. And I've

experienced better write speeds with a cheaper Samsung CD Writer than with

either an HP or an Iomega! Besides it's 100% free compared to Nero. So why

the long face?

G Menon

Disclaimer: These views are of Govind Menon's. CIOL does not necessarily subscribe to the same

tech-news