'MDM critical to achieve info governance'

MUMBAI, INDIA: Master data management (MDM) is critical to achieving effective information governance, according to Gartner Inc.

Failure to manage information accurately has been the root cause of several incidents, including the leak of sensitive information to WikiLeaks, and can be fatal to the success of MDM programmes.

Also Read: Key pillars of Master Data Management

“The recent global financial crisis has put information governance in the spotlight," said Ted Friedman, vice president and distinguished analyst at Gartner. “Information governance is a priority of IT and business leaders as a result of various pressures, including regulatory compliance mandates and the urgent need for improved decision-making.”

MDM is a technology-enabled business discipline in which business and IT organizations work together to ensure the uniformity, accuracy, stewardship, semantic consistency and accountability of the organization's official, shared master data assets.

It is increasingly identified by organizations with (1) the launch of a formal enterprise information management (EIM) strategy and (2) the foundation of an information governance program that supports EIM.

Gartner estimates worldwide MDM software revenue will reach $1.9 billion in 2012, a 21 per cent increase from 2011.

Gartner has compiled several MDM predictions to help organizations plan for 2012 and beyond. They include the following:

By 2016, 20 per cent of CIOs in regulated industries will lose their jobs for failing to implement the discipline of information governance successfully.

“We’ve seen rapidly growing interest in information governance-related topics, and this trend shows no sign of abating,” said Debra Logan, vice president and distinguished analyst at Gartner. “Information governance is the only way to comply with regulations, both current and future, and responsibility for it lies with the CIO and the chief legal officer. When organizations suffer high-profile data losses, especially involving violations of the privacy of citizens or consumers, they suffer serious reputational damage and often incur fines or other sanctions. IT leaders will have to take at least part of the blame for these incidents.”

In 2012, highly regulated businesses that do not already have information-archiving technology should invest in it in order to bring email and files under control. The governance-related technology of information archiving has reached early majority and is a key component of an evolving information governance technology strategy.

{#PageBreak#}

Through 2016, spending on governing information must increase to five times the current level to be successful.

During the next few years, information governance initiatives will broaden significantly to include more subdisciplines – information quality, life cycle management/retention, privacy and security – and more of the organization’s critical data. More people will have to be assigned to information governance, both in dedicated roles (such as information architect and data analyst) and as part-time contributors (such as stakeholders participating in information governance councils and data stewards).

“Regardless of the structure, information governance responsibilities will become part of the roles of more people, and the time and funding allocated to these roles will need to increase dramatically in the typical organization,” said Mr. Friedman. “Organizations will have to increase their investment in related tools and technologies, both to facilitate the development and refinement of policy, and to distill policies into executable rules that tools can apply to information.”

It is important to set an expectation that investment in information governance will have no end – information assets will be strategic to the organization for as long as it lasts, so information governance must be an "evergreen" program with ongoing funding.

Through 2016, only 33 per cent of organizations that initiate an MDM program will succeed in demonstrating the value of information governance.

When IT managers start an MDM program, they often struggle to get business stakeholders on board. They therefore fail to demonstrate the business value of MDM, as the necessary changes in business processes are not supported.

“An MDM programME is not a project but a commitment by the business to leverage information for reuse in order to improve business process outcomes,” said Andrew White, research vice president at Gartner. “The real barriers to MDM adoption remain ones of change management, governance process, organizational change and measurement of business value. The creation of effective governance organizations, policies and processes that focus on the master data life cycle is key to success with MDM.”

Organizations need to create an MDM governance framework, an organizational structure, and a set of roles and responsibilities to suit their MDM strategy and politics, says Gartner.