Advertisment

Former Netscape chief says Microsoft pact no help

author-image
CIOL Bureau
Updated On
New Update

Peter Kaplan

Advertisment

WASHINGTON: The US government's proposed settlement of the Microsoft Corp.

antitrust case would have failed to stop the software giant's illegal campaign

against Netscape in the 1990s, former Netscape chief executive officer James

Barksdale testified on Tuesday.

In written testimony to US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, Barksdale

said the settlement plan was full of loopholes and he favored the stiffer

sanctions sought by nine states that have refused to sign the settlement.

"As I review Microsoft's proposed remedy, I reach the unfortunate

conclusion that it would not have helped Netscape in the mid-1990s by preventing

Microsoft's anti-competitive behavior," he said.

Barksdale took the witness stand on the second day of what is expected to be

about two months of hearings into possible remedies in the landmark antitrust

case. The former Netscape CEO, along with an executive from Sun Microsystems

Inc., spent hours defending their testimony in support of the states' proposals

under questioning from Microsoft attorneys.

Advertisment

Under a separate proceeding, Kollar-Kotelly is considering the proposed

settlement of the nearly four-year-old case, reached in November between

Microsoft and the US Justice Department. Nine other states have agreed to sign

the deal.

Last June, a federal appeals court threw out some of the charges against

Microsoft but upheld a lower court ruling that the company had illegally

maintained its Windows software monopoly in personal computer operating systems.

The appellate judges agreed Microsoft had tried to crush rival Netscape

Communications after concluding that Netscape's Navigator browser was a threat

to Windows' dominance.

Advertisment

Fortunes declined



Barksdale on Tuesday said his company's fortunes declined once Microsoft put
Web-browsing software code in the same files that ran the Windows operating

system to prevent the Netscape Navigator browser becoming a platform for

software developers.

The proposed settlement would give computer makers greater ability to feature

rival software by allowing manufacturers to remove access to Microsoft

middleware. The non-settling states, that include California, Iowa and

Connecticut, want Microsoft to produce a version of Windows in which

"middleware," like the browser and media player, can be removed

entirely.

Barksdale said the proposed settlement would just hide Microsoft's middleware

from the user while the states' proposal would give consumers real choice and an

incentive for programmers to support alternative products.

Advertisment

"Had this remedy been in place during the mid-1990s, Netscape would have

been able to compete on the merits," Barksdale wrote of the states' plan.

Netscape was bought in 1999 by online services giant American Online, now AOL

Time Warner Inc., where Barksdale sits on the board of directors.

Microsoft has said the non-settling states' proposals are out of step with

lower-court rulings in the case and are designed to benefit Microsoft's

competitors, such as Sun Microsystems Inc., Oracle Corp. and AOL. Barksdale also

was critical of the settlement provisions intended to grant computer makers

flexibility to alter the appearance of Windows.

Barksdale said there were loopholes that allowed Microsoft to forbid

alterations of Windows when it did not compete with the non-Microsoft software

trying to be featured or if the rival software developer had failed to

distribute one million copies in the United States the previous year.

Advertisment

He said this last definition could have prevented Netscape Navigator from

gaining any user share at all when it first came out because Microsoft could

have prevented computer makers from offering an icon or other means to access

Navigator. During cross-examination, Microsoft attorney John Warden tried to

tear down Barksdale's testimony, noting that one company -- RealNetworks Inc. --

has been successful selling media players as middleware that run on Windows.

Warden cited a RealNetworks press release that claims the company has

distributed its media players to more than 250 million computer users.

Advertisment

Microsoft attacks Java



Earlier on Tuesday, Microsoft sought to portray Sun's Java programming language
as a product threatened by its own shortcomings rather than any anti-competitive

behavior by Microsoft.

Microsoft dropped Java support from Windows XP -- its latest version of

Windows -- and the non-settling states want Microsoft to resume support. The

appeals court in June reversed a lower court finding that Microsoft had violated

antitrust laws by promoting its own version of Sun's Java but concluded the

company had tried to freeze Java out of the market.

During cross-examination of Sun executive Richard Green, Microsoft attorney

Steve Holley on Tuesday cited a Sun memo from August 2001 that said some

customers, including brokerage Merrill Lynch, found Microsoft's software easier

to use.

Advertisment

"All three customers expressed a lack of faith in Sun's ability to

perform," the memo said. "There is little doubt we are suffering from

an image problem." Holley said the complaints undercut Sun's contention

that Java saves corporate customers money by allowing them to run their computer

applications across different platforms.

Green criticized Microsoft for dropping Java from Windows XP, saying there

was no business rationale for doing it. But Green's testimony also came under

the scrutiny of Kollar-Kotelly, who warned the dissenting states that their

witnesses were there to talk about possible antitrust sanctions -- not to level

new accusations against Microsoft.

Kollar-Kotelly said new allegations were out of bounds. "It's not going

to be part of my findings," she said. Sun recently filed a separate

antitrust suit against Microsoft for allegedly impeding its business and harming

Java.

tech-news