Apple Computer CEO Steve Jobs this week blasted the proposed settlement in
the private antitrust case against Microsoft. Apple and other critics of the
deal say the agreement amounts more to a sales and marketing coup for Microsoft
than punishment for ripping off consumers.
Under the terms of the deal Microsoft has agreed to donate $1 billion in
training, hardware and software to 12,000 American schools in poor districts and
rural communities. But those donations will have the effect of undercutting the
educational sales of Apple Computer and other hardware and software companies
who depend on that market for a significant portion of their sales.
"We're baffled that a settlement imposed against Microsoft for breaking
the law should allow, even encourage, them to unfairly make inroads into
education - one of the few markets left where they don't have monopoly power,''
Jobs said.
Jobs comments end nearly four years of silence after spending much of the
previous two decades criticizing Microsoft and it Windows products. In 1997
Apple received a $150 cash investment from Microsoft and the two companies have
been on relatively friendly terms ever since.
Edward Black, president of the Computer and Communications Industry
Association, said the class-action settlement would in effect allow Microsoft to
extend anticompetitive business practices to the education market. "By
allowing Microsoft to flood the education market with free software at virtually
no cost to the company, the court will be virtually assuring that no other
competitor will be able to charge for its products. The foreclosure of this
market to competition and consumer choice will only facilitate the continuation
of Microsoft's unlawful monopolistic strategy."
The settlement is being reviewed by US District Judge Frederick Motz in
Baltimore. Motz held court hearings this week to hear from educators, lawyers
and technology experts on both sides.
In a set-back for Microsoft and the backers of the settlement, economist
Keith Leffler who helped draft the proposed settlement admitted under
questioning by Motz that he had significantly underestimated the potential
damages caused by Microsoft's monopolistic pricing practices.
Leffler had estimated the damage at about $2.1 billion. But that number was
probably closer to $5 billion, he told the court.
The deal poses a big threat to Apple, which controls about 47 percent of the
K-12 education market. The company filed a brief arguing that the settlement
would only further Microsoft's monopoly power. "If this is a settlement
against harm that occurred in the marketplace the last thing you want the
settlement to do is bring that harm to the one sector where there's been a very
broad choice,'' said Linda Roberts, who directed the Clinton Administration's
educational technology program and now consults for companies including Apple.
Microsoft has argued that schools will be able to decide how they want to
spend the money and could use it to purchase products from competing companies.
But schools who choose Microsoft products will be given more resources, such as
free software.
The opposition to the private antitrust settlement comes just as Microsoft is
also seeing the opposition against the government's antitrust settlement grow.
This week, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who had held out on
accepting the deal, became the latest official to back away from the proposed
settlement saying the agreement "has too many gaps and ambiguities. The
settlement reflects good progress but not good enough. Among my concerns are the
need for a longer length of time, a stronger enforcement mechanism, and tighter
anti-retaliation and disclosure provisions."