Whether Windows XP is released to the public in its present form on October
25 is a decision that will be largely up to US District Judge Colleen
Kollar-Kotelly who was appointed as the new judge in the government's antitrust
lawsuit against Microsoft. It will be Kollar-Kotelly's job to determine what
measures are appropriate to punish Microsoft for its anti-competitive behavior.
Kollar-Kotelly is a judge with a reputation as a meticulous but slow moving
jurist. She was appointed to the bench by former US President Clinton in
1997. Before that she was also a judge on the District of Columbia's
Superior Court from 1984 until being named to the federal court. Earlier
in her career she worked as an attorney for a Washington psychiatric hospital
and the Justice Department's Criminal Division.
Kollar-Kotelly's relatively short career does not involve antitrust cases and
her expertise lies in the area of criminal law. In a case that received
international attention, she ruled that Iran had to pay $355 million to
relatives of a US Marine who was kidnapped and killed in Lebanon by a group
financed directly by Iran's government.
In a sign that could spell trouble for Microsoft, in two significant cases
Kollar-Kotelly sided with consumers. One case involved a decision against the
powerful banking industry and in another case she ruled in favor of a company
that was making a generic version of a cancer drug.
But the judge also has received criticism for being slow in rendering
decisions. In a fast-moving industry such as computers, and a case as
complicated as the Microsoft antitrust lawsuit, a slow approach could easily
wreck havoc on the case. If she granted an injunction against Windows XP, it
could paralyze Microsoft and its product development. One the other hand,
Windows XP could easily be history by the time she concludes the case, which
would hurt the government's case and the companies that are at risk of being
competed out of business by the inclusion of competing applications in Windows
XP.
Kollar-Kotelly is taking over from Thomas Penfield Jackson who found
Microsoft guilty of antitrust violations and ordered the company split in two.
But the Appeals Court, in June, set aside Jackson's break-up and other
punishment rulings saying Jackson had not given Microsoft sufficient opportunity
to argue against the break-up. They also removed Jackson from the case because
Jackson talked to the media about the case. But the court upheld most of
Jackson's key findings against the company, including that it operates an
illegal monopoly.
Meanwhile, Microsoft is feverishly trying to get Windows XP out into the
market before the new Judge has a chance to force the company to make changes to
the program. This week, Microsoft started shipping Windows XP to computer
manufacturers and is reportedly pushing computer makers to start shipping
computers with Windows XP ahead of the October 25 launch date. Once released in
the market it will be very difficult for the courts to halt Windows XP. But it
is widely expected that the government will quickly move to ask for an
injunction against the software.
To make the release as dramatic as possible, five major computer
manufacturers picked up their master copies of Windows XP during a ceremony at
Microsoft's headquarters. The promptly left aboard a helicopter bound for five
private jets that flew the executives and master copies straight back to their
manufacturing plants.