'New iPhone 5s is limited to five fingerprints'

NEW YORK, USA: With the new release of Apple's iPhone 5c and 5s, MinuteHound reviews the technology and give users an insight of what the technology could and should have been.

CIOL: Why is Apple's new Touch ID, limited to five fingerprints?

MinuteHound: The new feature is the new Touch-ID biometric Fingerprint scanner. The fingerprint scanner will be used as an identification source for unlocking the phone and identifying the individual when attempting to download apps.

Regarding limitation, The new iPhone 5s is limited to 5 fingerprints. The limitation exists because there is only limited space available on the iPhone's A7 chip, and matching fingerprints can become a processor-intensive task.

CIOL: Where are these fngerprints located? Is this secure?

MinuteHound: The Fingerprints are stored on the iPhone itself, specifically inside the new A7 chip. The print is stored within the chip as opposed to the solid-state memory in an attempt to improve security.

The security of this type of setup is potentially susceptible to hackers. A hacker or government official could potentially hack into an iPhone and have access to a persons fingerprint. This hacker could then create a copy of the fingerprint and use it maliciously in many ways. The fact that the Fingerprint data is stored on the personal iPhone A7 Chip also creates a space/memory issue.

In the future, when Apple implements fingerprint readers in the rest of their product line, consumers will need to re-scan their finger and have one print stored in each device. This could theoretically multiply the security vulnerabilities, because a hacker could attempt to access the least secure device. An offsite, segmented solution would be much safer.

CIOL: Where Apple's new iPhone 5s biometric went wrong.

MinuteHound: It is very apparent that America is entering the biometric age. Computers, cars, laptops, tablets, and now Apple iPhone's will require a fingerprint to access personal information. Even Microsoft released the Windows Biometric Framework years ago anticipating that an increasing number of devices would be driven by biometrics. Just like Microsoft, MinuteHound has been developing biometric software and devices in anticipation of a shift in the world that will require a more secure way to access and store indispensable information.

The biggest roadblock to biometrics is the safety and security of information, and that is where Apple's iPhone 5s went wrong. Why, in this day and age, would Apple store a fingerprint locally, on the phone? People misplace their phone or have it stolen every day, posing huge liability to the actual owner. Before biometrics, losing a password was a threat, but now Apple has made it possible to steal someone's fingerprint.

CIOL: What Apple should do to improve the new Apple iPhone 5s

MinuteHound: Apple needs to take a look at what MinuteHound has been doing for many years, which is encrypting a finger and/or thumb print and using cloud based software for storage.

For example, one part of MinuteHound's secure, patented technology is that every time a user scans his or her print, that fingerprint is immediately broken down and transferred to multiple cloud locations using 128-bit encryption.

The print is never stored, but instead converted into a binary number. This means if someone stole the scanner or computer no sensitive data would be lost. Even if a hacker accessed one of the servers, all they would find is a bunch of numbers not identifiable to them. MinuteHound's biometric software poses no information risk at all. It is completely safe to use.

Apple has been using cloud technology for a long time, and it is very interesting why they could not find a way to incorporate secure biometric technology, such as MinuteHound's, with their latest release. Maybe they are waiting for their next iPhone...