In a desperate, but seemingly mute effort to survive, Napster this week
offered to pay five record companies $1 billion in royalties over the next five
years. The company also promised it would ensure that its 64 million members
would no longer be able to exchange copyrighted material.
Napster CEO Hank Barry said he and company founder Shawn Fanning hoped to
quickly reach an agreement with the record companies. "We're saying this is
something consumers really want. Let's do something to keep it going." But
Napster fans should not get their hopes up that a deal is in the works. The
record industry reacted cool to Napster’s offer. "We divide the world
into two kinds of people: those who respect the rights of creators and owners of
intellectual property to determine how and when their property is used, and
those who do not. Napster and its ilk are in the latter category,"
commented AOL-Time Warner co-chief operating officer Richard Parsons.
Edgar Bronfman Jr., vice chairman of Vivendi Universal added, "My view
is that all the labels will come together and make their music available online.
What we will not tolerate is rewarding Napster for 16 months of infringing our
copyrights."
Sony and EMI have not yet commented on Napster's latest offer, but few
analysts expect any of the top record labels to be interested in letting Napster
distribute the hundreds of thousands of copyrighted songs they own. Rather than
letting Napster control the online distribution of music, the record companies
are exploring their own avenues of catering to what has quickly become a
potentially lucrative new marketing channel.
The industry now has the legal mandate to force Napster to shut down its Web
site and that is expected to be ordered formally by a federal judge in the next
two weeks. Although Napster has offered to force members to pay a subscription
fee, "Napster is basically trying to purchase the copyrights and resell
them," said Susan Billheimer, an analyst with Zona Research. "The
record companies are more interested in distributing their music themselves over
the Internet."
Napster’s offer includes annual payments of $150 million to Sony, Warner,
BMG, EMI and Universal for five years. An additional $50 million would go to
independent labels in each of those five years.
In return, Napster wants the record industry to drop the copyright
infringement lawsuits they have filed. Napster’s plan calls for charging
members $3 to $10 a month for music downloading services. It figures that some 5
million of its 50 million members would sign up immediately, generating annual
revenues of around $295 million. With 17 million registered users by the fifth
year, Napster would generate more than $1 billion dollars annually.
But the plan has fallen largely on deaf ears. "It is Napster's
responsibility to come to the creative community with a legitimate business
model and a system that protects our artists and copyrights," said a
spokesman for the Universal Music Group. "Nothing we have heard in the past
and nothing we have heard today suggests they have yet been able to accomplish
that task."