Microsoft appears to have "won the battle but lost the war" in its
effort to keep the antitrust case from being reviewed by the US Supreme Court.
On one hand, the Appeals Court denied a government motion not to hear Microsoft’s
request for a stay of the restraining order. But the court also told Microsoft
that it would stop the Appeals process as soon as Federal Judge Thomas Penfield
Jackson refers the case to the Supreme Court, a move expected to be announced
within the next 48 hours.
Microsoft last week petitioned the Appeals Court to stay the temporary
restraining orders issued by Jackson as part of his antitrust verdict against
the company. The Appeals Court said it would hear Microsoft’s petition for as
long as the case is not being reviewed in the higher court. After Jackson refers
the case to the Supreme Court, only that body can stay the restraining order.
Microsoft’s only hope will be that the Supreme Court will refer the review of
Microsoft’s general appeal back to the Appeals Court.
While the Supreme Court is scheduled to close for a three-month recess at the
end of this month, legal experts said the court is likely to review the
Microsoft stay request before going on recess. A temporary stay can be, and is
likely, to be granted by even a single Supreme Court judge. Microsoft spokesman
Jim Cullinan said Microsoft is confident that the Supreme Court justices would
have ample opportunity to act on its stay request before the business
restrictions take effect in September. "We believe whichever court does
this, whether it is the appeals court or the Supreme Court, our stay motion will
be ruled on sooner than later."
Government lawyers were pleased despite the denial of their motion by the
Appeals Court. ''We're very pleased with the court's ruling that it would stay
further proceedings if the district court certifies the case for direct appeal
to the Supreme Court,'' said spokeswoman for the Justice Department Gina
Talamona. Microsoft on Monday also pleaded with Jackson not to send the case to
the Supreme Court, arguing that the company has a right to have the case go
through the regular legal process. "There is no justification for tendering
a complex case with voluminous records directly to the Supreme Court,''
Microsoft lawyers told Jackson.
Jackson is expected to ignore Microsoft’s pleas on the ground that he has
the right to refer the case and that the importance of the matter warrants an
immediate review at the highest judicial level.