Court overturns Microsoft ruling

SAN FRANCISCO: A federal appeals court has overturned a

$521 million patent infringement ruling against Microsoft Corp. and ordered a

lower court to retry the case against the world's largest software maker.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said the

original verdict, which found that parts of Microsoft's Internet Explorer Web

browser had infringed on technology developed by privately held firm Eolas

Technologies Inc. and the University of California, had ignored two of

Microsoft's key arguments.

 

The case sparked concerns that Microsoft would have to

alter its Internet browser, making it unable to run certain applets, or
mini-applications, that run on Web pages. Microsoft's browser is used by 9 of

every 10 Web surfers.

But a year ago, Microsoft won a ruling by the U.S. Patent

and Trademark Office, which invalidated a claim by the plaintiffs to the browser

technology that allows other mini-applications to work with Microsoft's Internet

Explorer.

"We have maintained throughout this process that the Eolas

patent is not valid and today's ruling is a clear affirmation of our position,"

Microsoft spokeswoman Stacy Drake said in an e-mailed statement.

 

Martin Lueck, the lawyer heading the business litigation

group at Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP that represented Eolas, was not
immediately available for comment.

 

Redmond based Microsoft said it was looking forward to

presenting its case again. No date has been set for a retrial.
 

In Wednesday's ruling by the Appeals Court judges, they

said "this court vacates the district court's decisions and remands for further
proceedings on these issues," according to court documents.

 

In 2003, an Illinois jury delivered a $521 million verdict

against Microsoft, saying it infringed on technology developed by Eolas and the
University of California. That ruling was later upheld in early 2004 by Judge

James Zagel of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.



 

In response, Microsoft said it would prepare a version of

Internet Explorer without the technology in question, but held off on making key
changes after the patent office said it would reexamine the Eolas patent.

Internet standards groups, including the World Wide Web

Consortium, had argued that preexisting inventions may invalidate Eolas' patent

claims.

 

Pressure from software developers that depend on

Microsoft's Internet Explorer also likely prompted the company's decision to
hold off on making changes.

 

Lueck, the lawyer for Eolas, had previously said his client

was still open to a settlement with Microsoft. Microsoft's Drake declined to
comment on the possibility of a settlement.

 

Shares in Microsoft closed down 2 cents on Nasdaq on

Wednesday at $25.26.

(Additional reporting by Peter Kaplan in Washington)