Similar to Australia, all these countries saw growth over the previous quarter in unit shipment and revenue, except Singapore. A combination of seasonal low server spending in the second quarter and a still-cautious level of business confidence led to further contraction quarter on quarter in server shipments (-5.2 percent) and revenue (-38.4 percent) in Singapore. In China, the peak in purchasing in 2Q08 led to a drop of -2.5 percent year-on-year in the second quarter of 2009.
Shipments of x86 servers declined 16.6 percent year-on-year. At the same time, revenue declined 12.2 percent, accounting for 52 percent of the server market. Mainframes had another strong quarter with 31.8 percent growth year-on-year, thanks to successes mainly in Australia and the South Korean financial sector. On the other hand RISC/IA 64 platforms declined at 23 percent over the same period last year.
Shipments of blade servers (including x86 blades and RISC/IA-64 blades) represented 12 percent of total units and reported 15.1 percent year-over-year growth during the second quarter of 2009.
Table 1: Asia/Pacific: Server Vendor Revenue Estimates, 2Q 2009 (U.S. Dollars) Vendor 2Q 2009 Revenue US$ Million 2Q 2009 Market Share (%) 2Q 2008 Revenue US$ Million 2Q 2008 Market Share (%) 2Q09-2Q08 Growth Rate (%) IBM 669.7 39.2 771.4 38.4 -13.2 Hewlett-Packard 521.2 30.5 638.5 31.8 -18.4 Dell Inc. 209.2 12.2 190.9 9.5 9.6 Sun Microsystems 156.3 9.2 233.6 11.6 -33.1 Lenovo 21.9 1.3 28.1 1.4 -22.1 Other Vendors 129.3 7.6 147.3 7.3 -12.2 Grand Total 1,707.5 100.0 2,009.7 100.0 -15.0 Source: Gartner (September 2009)
All major server vendors experienced year-on-year revenue decline, as shown in Table 1, except Dell. HP retained the leading position in server shipments with 29 percent market share with majority of them in the x86 platform.
In revenue terms, IBM maintained its first position by controlling 39 percent of total revenue in 2Q09. Although IBM saw strong growth of mainframes this quarter, its Power Systems continued to suffer under the impact of global downturn and reported a double-digit revenue decline during the quarter.
Dell increased its share of shipments to 22.9 percent in the second quarter of 2009, however continued to feel the pressure of the weak economy as volume fell 12.3 percent year-on-year. Dell had a better picture in terms of revenue during the quarter as it continued to take advantage of its direct sales model that appeared to help in increasing its product’s selling price.
Because of the uncertainty surrounding the effect of Oracle’s purchase of Sun Microsystems, the latter’s overall server revenue went down 33 percent year-over-year while its revenue share went down 3 points to 9 percent in the second quarter of 2009.
Table 2: Asia/Pacific: Server Vendor Shipment Estimates, 2Q 2009 units) Vendor 2Q 2009 2Q 2009 Market Share (%) 2Q 2008 2Q 2008 Market Share (%) 2Q09-2Q08 Growth Rate (%) Hewlett-Packard 93,173 28.8 118,063 30.2 -21.1 Dell Inc. 73,905 22.9 84,240 21.6 -12.3 IBM 70,530 21.8 90,312 23.1 -21.9 Lenovo 13,089 4.0 14,800 3.8 -11.6 Sun Microsystems 9,956 3.1 14,655 3.8 -32.1 Other Vendors 62,735 19.4 68,688.0 17.5 -8.7 Grand Total 323,388 100.0 390,758 100.0 -17.2 Source: Gartner (September 2009)
Get most out of your technology infrastructure investments with Dell
About CIOL | Media Kit | Site Map | Contact Us | Help | Write to us | Jobs@CyberMedia | Privacy Policy
Copyright © CyberMedia India Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Usage of content from web site is subject to Terms and Conditions.