Volunteers log off as Wikipedia ages: WSJ

BANGALORE, INDIA: There was a time when online encyclopedia meant Wikipedia. However, of late the fifth-most-popular Web site in the world has been losing its sheen and many of the online volunteers who write, edit and police the site are quitting.

In a recent interview to 'The Wall Street Journal', Andrew Lih, author of Wikipedia Revolution, said that volunteers have been departing the project that bills itself as "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" faster than new ones have been joining, and the net losses have accelerated over the past year.

In the first three months of 2009, the English-language Wikipedia suffered a net loss of more than 49,000 editors, ten times compared to a net loss of 4,900 during the same period a year earlier, according to Spanish researcher Felipe Ortega, who analyzed Wikipedia's data on the editing histories of its more than three million active contributors in 10 languages.

Executives at the Wikimedia Foundation, which finances and oversees the nonprofit venture, acknowledge the declines, but believe they can continue to build a useful encyclopedia with a smaller pool of contributors, said WSJ.

Sure, Wikipedia still remains enormously popular among users, with the number of Web visitors growing 20 per cent in the 12 months ending in September, according to comScore Media Metrix. However, the question is that how the weakening of the volunteers affect the reliability of the content.

Recently a study by computer scientist Ed Chi and colleagues had warned that changes in the Wikipedia website could compromise the encyclopaedia's quality in the long term.

The number of articles added to the site with over three million articles, had come down considerably since 2006.

Of course, the declines in participation have raised questions about the encyclopedia's ability to continue expanding its breadth and improving its accuracy. After all the lifeline of a website is its accuracy. Lack of a strong team of editorial volunteers may adversely affect the reliability of Wikipedia.

In this context we would like to know what do you think of the authenticity of the information on Wikipedia?

S Africa's Internet providers to fight trafficking

Gujarat to introduce e-ration cards

Net, mobile spaces to see 19 p.c. pay hike

TCS to give salary hike in April

Billionaire leads buyout for Astro

Corporate fraud: Should IT systems be blamed?

Wipro fraud accused commits suicide: report

Phishing on the Indian Tax department

Naash Kaum 2010: All .. Iz .. Well!

Infosys plans wage hikes in April

Default Title

Default Title

Default Title

Default Title

Name
Email
Your reply