CIOL: Do you feel the amount allocated for IT is sufficient if yes why? If not why not? How much should you be spending?
RM: IT being typically treated as a cost center, it is extremely important that any investment made in IT should be measured by evaluating as to how it has lowered the total cost of ownership to business. As an IT company that is growing, it is not possible to lower the absolute amount of investment. Hence the yardstick for measurement is to primarily focus on reducing the unit cost of providing IT services to the employees of the organization. We have been able to successfully demonstrate this across all domains. The business value delivered in terms of contribution to the bottom line has been apt so far.

CIOL: How big is the IT staff in your organization?
RM: The total IT organization size globally inclusive of outsourced staff is around 160. This team supports the various business entities within the group engaged in the business of IT services and KPO.

CIOL: As a global company how are you networked all the centres?
RM: All the global delivery and sales offices are networked using multiple technologies such as ATM, MPLS, Frame Relay and IPsec VPN’s over the Internet cloud. The core network is built over Nortel Passport WAN switches that support data, voice over IP and video traffic. This backbone enables us to seamlessly integrate into our customer networks securely while at the same time providing scalability and high availability to meet varied requirements at an optimum cost.
 
CIOL: Is it difficult to gets adequate funds for IT implementations?
RM: The biggest challenge for CIO’s for getting funds for new IT implementations is to continuously work on reducing operating expenses as a percentage of the total budget for keeping lights ON and meet business expectations of IT availability. It is always a moving target as every CIO would like to get the maximum funds diverted for new implementations.

CIOL: What part of IT implementations plays a more prominent role? Software or hardware or networking? Why?
RM: IT needs to be viewed as a tool and not the end. Hence no individual component whether it is hardware, software or networking is individually more or less important. What business gets in a highly mobile environment in today’s context is a function of achievements across all these domains to enhance the user experience level

CIOL: The success or failure of an IT deployment should be attributed to whom, the CIO or the vendor, or is it a collaborative accountability?
RM: Though any CIO would like to always have a joint accountability or would like to blame it on the vendor to cover up for failure, I firmly believe that it is always the CIO’s accountability for the success or failure of an IT deployment. One can’t have a situation where the CIO is complemented for success but the stick is on a collaborative accountability or put on the vendor. The CIO is in the best situation to know what fits his business the most and also the prerogative to choose the vendor and partner most suited to be successful for his business environment.